For K-12 districts on Google Workspace

Know who has every Chromebook. Because only they can sign in.

UserAuthGuard assigns each device to one student and has Google enforce it at the sign-in screen. Spares, loaners and devices out for repair carry their own state, so the record still matches the shelf in June.

Enforced by Google

Built on Google Admin’s own Sign-in restriction. A student who isn’t assigned to a Chromebook gets Google’s error at the sign-in screen. There’s no app on the device to tamper with.

No OU work by hand

UserAuthGuard creates one OU per device, named by serial, inside your Assigned OU. Policy is inherited; only the allowed student is per device. Reassign, and the lock moves with it.

See it before you enforce it

Connect Google Admin free and see every device and every assignment gap. Turn the lock on when you’re ready.

Or host a 30-minute lunch-and-learn for your IT team.

11% of Chicago’s devices lost or stolen in one year · $23M of them, 77,505 devices · $650 to replace one now, about $400 in 2024

No credit card required · FERPA & COPPA Compliant · Works with Google Admin

How it works

Google already has the lock. UserAuthGuard does the bookkeeping.

Every Chromebook opens for exactly one student, the one it’s assigned to, so you always know who is responsible for it, and who was before.

  1. 1

    Google already has the lock

    Google Admin › Devices › Chrome › Settings › Device settings › Sign-in restriction › “Restrict sign-in to a list of users”. Per Google: “Only users that you designate can sign in to devices. Other users get an error message.”

  2. 2

    The catch: it’s set per OU

    Device settings apply to an organizational unit. Giving one Chromebook to one student means that Chromebook needs its own OU with that student listed: thousands of OUs, edited by hand, and redone at every swap. That’s why almost no district does it.

  3. 3

    UserAuthGuard does the bookkeeping

    For each assigned device it creates an OU named by the device’s serial inside a parent Assigned OU, sets the allowed user to the assigned student, and moves the device in.

  4. 4

    Policy stays in one place

    Every device OU inherits the parent’s filtering, apps and network settings. Only the allowed user is local to the device. Google Admin labels these settings Inherited or Locally applied, so you can see which is which.

  5. 5

    The lock follows the assignment

    Reassign, swap or return a device and UserAuthGuard updates the allowed user. The district always knows who has each device, and who had it before.

One Chromebook, one allowed student The student the device is assigned to signs in normally. Any other account is refused by Google at the sign-in screen, before a session starts. THE ASSIGNED STUDENT Signs in Their device, their policies ANY OTHER ACCOUNT Refused by Google No session ever starts THE SAME CHROMEBOOK
Diagram, not a screenshot. Enforcement happens at Google’s own sign-in screen via the Sign-in restriction on the device’s organizational unit, so an unassigned account never reaches a session. There is no app on the device to tamper with.
A Chromebook sign-in screen showing a UserAuthGuard owner plate: "This Chromebook belongs to Jordan K.", with the device serial and a return QR code.
The assignment, on the device itself. UserAuthGuard renders this onto the Chromebook’s sign-in screen, so the device says who it belongs to before anyone touches it. Sample district, student and serial.
For a CTO

Google Admin’s Sign-in restriction can limit a Chromebook to named users, but it’s set per OU, so real 1:1 enforcement means one OU per device. UserAuthGuard automates that: assign a device and it creates an OU named by serial under a parent Assigned OU, sets the allowed user to that student, and moves the device in. Everything else is inherited from Assigned, so you still manage policy in one place. Reassign or return the device and the allowed user updates, with a dated history. Enforcement happens at Google’s own sign-in screen, so there is no agent on the device to tamper with. Keep guest mode and managed guest sessions off, because Google notes those bypass the restriction. Changes usually apply within minutes but Google allows up to 24 hours.

Google Chrome Enterprise Help: Set ChromeOS device policies: Sign-in restriction →

Scroll the table sideways to see every column →

A record of an assignment is not an assignment
What districts are usually sold What it records Stops another student signing in? Who’s accountable when it’s lost
Paper sign-out sheet or note A name next to a serial number No Whoever the sheet says, if it’s current
Spreadsheet or asset tracker Serial-to-student rows in a database No, the Chromebook never knows Whoever the record says; it drifts
Barcode check-in / check-out Scanned hand-offs at a desk No, not between hand-offs The last person scanned
Locate-and-recover after loss Where a device went after it went missing No, it acts after the fact Unknown until recovered
UserAuthGuard per-device sign-in lock The assignment, enforced by Google at sign-in Yes, only the assigned student The assigned student, with prior holders on record

Categories only. No vendor is named, and no claim is made about any specific product.

How the shift happens

Three moves from write-off to stewardship

  1. The cost

    Name the problem

    Device loss isn’t a kid problem, it’s a governance gap. You can’t fix what you can’t see, and a spreadsheet can’t see it.

  2. The mechanism

    Name the solution

    Device identity becomes the policy. Each Chromebook is bound to its own OU, so accountability comes from Google Workspace enforcing it rather than from watching anyone.

  3. The win

    Name the outcome

    Every device accounted for, every assignment audit-logged, every loss investigated. You can answer who had it, and when.

The product

Assignment is one screen. The rest hangs off it.

Search a student, search a device, assign. UserAuthGuard writes the OU, sets the allowed user and records who had the device before. Every feature below works from that one record.

  • Per-device sign-in lock. One OU per device, named by serial, with policy inherited from your Assigned OU.
  • Bulk assignment from a CSV. Serial and student per row. Spares, loaners and devices out for repair carry their own state.
  • Check-in and check-out. A QR code on each device for the front office, and every hand-off dated.
  • Chain of custody. Who has it now, who had it before, and when it changed hands.
  • Lost mode. Mark a device lost and it shows a return message with your contact details. You already know who had it.
  • End-of-year return. Scan devices back in, match each to its student, note chargers and condition, and see what is still out.
Every feature, in detail
UserAuthGuard assignment screen: search for a student, search for a device, assign.
The device stewardship journey

Where is your district right now?

Every district sits somewhere on this line. Most are in the first two stages and can’t put a number on what it’s costing them.

Where most districts are: the cost stays invisible
Where the record is enforced: every device has a name on it
Where most districts are Stage 1

Reactive Recovery

“Lost devices are just part of the job. Kids will be kids.”
No idea who has what. Losses are written off, not investigated.
The cost
The full write-off, every year, invisible
Where most districts are Stage 2

Spreadsheet Tracking

“We track serial numbers in a spreadsheet. It’s messy but it works.”
The sheet is true in October, wrong by December. No audit trail.
The cost
Same write-off, now in a spreadsheet
Where the record is enforced Stage 3

Active Stewardship

“We have a real-time system. We investigate every loss. We recover devices.”
Every assignment is logged and enforced at sign-in. Each loss has a name attached.
The change
Every loss has a name and a date
Where the record is enforced Stage 4

Accountable Fleet

“We know where every device is, who has it, and what condition it’s in. The refresh plan is built on that.”
The record matches the shelf. Refresh budget defended on a record, not a guess.
The change
Replacement spend is a decision, not a surprise

What the same losses cost you now

At 2024 prices · $400 a device

$400,000

per year

At today's prices · $650 a device

$650,000

per year

The same number of lost devices now costs you

$250,000 more

a 63% increase, and nothing about your loss rate changed

≈ 3 full-time staff at $80,000 each, just in the price rise

What the audits actually found

  • Chicago Public Schools: 77,505 devices reported lost or stolen in 2021–22, original price over $23 million. The district's Inspector General put it at 11% of its devices and called it “alarming.” After the report, more than 11,800 turned up. They were unaccounted for, not gone.
  • Centralia School District, Washington: the State Auditor's 2025 report found nearly 1,000 Chromebooks unaccounted for, worth close to $300,000. Auditors asked the district to produce 20 specific devices; it could not find 11 of them.
  • In a Frontline Education poll of 26 school business and technology leaders, more than half put annual device loss at 6% or higher.

Chicago spent $2.6 million a year on services that freeze and geo-track devices. In the year ending June 2022 they recovered eleven. Tracking a device after it goes missing is not the same as knowing who had it.

Education Chromebooks went from about $400 to over $600 a unit inside a year. Memory makers shifted capacity to high-bandwidth memory for AI data centers, and the shortage hit the cheapest devices hardest. Upper Darby School District told WHYY in August 2026 it now pays over $600 and spends $2–3 million a year on replacements.

See what you still have. It’s free.
Active stewardship in motion

Stages 3 and 4 are a routine, not a purchase

The lock gives every device a name. Keeping the record true through a school year is a loop: check device health, run the sweep, and give students a reason to look after the device that is theirs.

Stewardship as a habit

Monthly health checks, run by students

Students walk a guided self-check (keyboard, screen, speaker, battery) and earn points and streaks for keeping their device healthy. An honest damage report earns credit instead of a ticket.

IT sees: a Fleet Health dashboard: condition by school, model and age, with at-risk devices surfaced before they fail.
The sweep that closes

Schedule a sweep. It escalates until it’s done.

Push a refresh or return campaign to any group (a school, a grade, a serial list) across a date window. Reminders escalate on their own, up to a lock on the device, until every device is checked in or accounted for.

IT sees: live completion % per campaign. Students see: a clear prompt, not a mystery.
Students take part

Students engage because it’s theirs

Points, streaks and milestones reward the things that keep a fleet whole: clean returns, on-time checks, honest reporting. The student sees their own score and nothing else.

Students see: their points and streak, never productivity scores or browsing history.
The core product never surveils students: no screen capture, no browsing history, no after-school tracking. Classroom and safety tools are a separate paid extension a district turns on deliberately. Privacy by architecture, not by policy.
Case studies

Real districts, in their own words

Verbatim quotes from customers. We don’t attach before/after numbers they didn’t give us.

“UserAuthGuard has saved our team several hours each week by eliminating the need to manually investigate device usage and ownership in Google Admin logs.”
AC
Alex Castillo
Union City Public Schools • 13,000+ active Chromebooks
13,000+
active Chromebooks
New Jersey
Hudson County
Read the Union City case study
“I would absolutely recommend UserAuthGuard to other districts. If you need to keep track of your devices and you’re using Google Admin, it’s a no-brainer.”
MM
Matt Miller
Southeast Delco School District • 6,943 Chromebooks
6,943
Chromebooks
Pennsylvania
Delaware County
Read the Southeast Delco case study
Free · PDF · No nurture sequence

Get the Device Stewardship Maturity Model

The full four-stage model, a five-question self-assessment, and the concrete moves between each stage: the same framework on this page, in a one-pager you can take to a board meeting.

One email with the PDF and a calendar link. No marketing list sale, no automated drip.
FAQ

Questions districts ask

The lock, the free plan, and what the product deliberately does not do.

01

What is UserAuthGuard?

Device management for K-12 districts on Google Workspace. It assigns each Chromebook to one student and has Google enforce that at the sign-in screen. Around that assignment it keeps the record: who has each device, who had it before, check-in and check-out, lost mode, and end-of-year return.

02

How does the per-device sign-in lock work?

Google Admin’s Sign-in restriction can limit a Chromebook to named users, but it is set per organizational unit. UserAuthGuard gives each assigned device its own OU under a parent Assigned OU, names the student as the allowed user and moves the device in. Filtering, apps and network settings are inherited from the parent, so you still manage policy in one place.

03

What happens when another student tries to sign in?

They get Google’s own error at the sign-in screen and no session starts, so there is nothing on the device to work around. Keep guest mode and managed guest sessions off; Google documents that those bypass the restriction.

04

What happens when a device is reassigned, swapped or returned?

The allowed user updates with it, and the previous holder stays on the record with dates. Spares, loaners and devices out for repair carry their own state, so the record matches what is on the shelf.

05

Is there a free plan?

Yes. Connecting Google Admin and seeing your whole fleet is free: every device, user and OU, plus assignment-gap reporting, with no device cap and no credit card. Enforcement is paid, priced per student, à la carte, alongside flat-priced bulk utilities and a separate classroom and safety extension. See pricing.

06

Does UserAuthGuard replace GoGuardian or Securly?

No. Filters govern what a student can do once signed in. UserAuthGuard decides who can sign in at all and keeps the record of who has the device. The two work side by side.

07

Does UserAuthGuard monitor students?

The core product does not. The lock is a Google Workspace setting, not software on the device, and the device record holds assignments, not activity.

Classroom and safety tools (live classroom view, content blocking, keyword alerts) are a separate paid extension, deployed through Google Admin, that a district turns on deliberately.

08

How does UserAuthGuard handle lost Chromebooks?

Mark a device lost and it shows a return message with your contact details. Because the device was assigned to one student, you already know who had it, and the chain of custody shows who had it before.

09

Does it handle inventory, repairs and end-of-year return?

Yes. Each device carries its assignment history, warranty status and repair tickets. At the end of the year, scan devices back in, match each to its student, note chargers and condition, and see what is still out.

See your whole fleet free

Connect Google Admin and see every device and every assignment gap. No credit card. Pay only to enforce it.

Ready to make every Chromebook open for one student?

Connect Google Admin and see every device and every assignment gap, free. Turn the lock on when you’re ready.

37,596 Chromebooks under management in PA and NJ districts

No credit card · FERPA & COPPA · Patent pending · Works with Google Admin